Decisions for the valuers or points for the courts
This article considers two very similar sets of circumstances in which an expert’s conclusions were challenged. In both cases lawyers tried to use the crowbar of legal points of principle with the aim of broadening the concept of 'manifest error' by the expert.
If these action had succeeded the garment in which experts undertake determinations would be replaced by exceedingly tight whalebone corsetry.
In the case of Premier Telecom Communication Group Limited (EWCA Civ 994) [2014], it was argued that the experts had strayed into legal territory and had addressed matters which should have been the preserve of the Court.
Continue reading
This content is not freely available. To access 'Decisions for the valuers or points for the courts' you need to be one of the following:
ACA student
This content is available to ACA students. If you want to start the ACA qualification there are several routes you can take
Business and Finance Professional
An internationally recognised designation and professional status from the ICAEW.
Forensic & Expert Witness Community
Essential resources, news and support for forensic accountants and expert witnesses..