A: Possibly. HMRC will address a case like this by applying their Statement of Practice 4 (1983) with regards to the issue of the artificial separation of business activities to try and determine whether:
- There are 2 businesses in separate legal entities (sole trader and partnership) and so they can remain unregistered for VAT as each of their taxable turnovers, at £50k, are below the current VAT registration limit of £85k;
- There are 2 legal entities but that split is artificial and so HMRC would then issue a direction that, from a current date, they should be treated as one business and so be immediately VAT registered; or,
- There is a failed separation so in HMRC’s eyes there was only ever one entity that has been operating one business and this entity would be VAT registrable from when (in the past) the combined taxable turnover limit for VAT was breached.
See HMRC’s VAT Single Entity and Disaggregation manual online (including VATDSAG02100) for further guidance. This is not an exact science but, on the facts given, there appears to be a strong risk of challenge from HMRC, especially if they can show close financial, economic and organisational links between the two FHL activities, for example the lack of cross-charges, the close proximity of the FHLs, the same agent and cleaner used and, potentially, the extent of Mrs Smith’s involvement in either ‘business’.
These publications from Markel Tax were correct at the time of going to press and should be considered as principles-based guidance only. To check current validity, call the Markel Tax helpline. ICAEW (as distributor) disclaims all liability for any errors or omissions.
About Markel Tax
Markel Tax offers expert advice on UK tax and VAT via its helpline and provides monthly FAQs with questions and answers on common tax issues for businesses and practitioners.
