Conclusion
A multi-strand approach encompassing remit, people, skills and processes will be need to significantly improve financial management performance to commercial best practice.
This will require a cultural shift, up-skilling of personal and investment over many years to achieve similar levels of performance. The difference between government and business is that in the latter, the commercial case for making such improvements is usually compelling. The financial management performance of commercial organisations, their ability to understand their position and effectively manage their resources, are critical to staying in business.
Government does not have the same immediate threat of insolvency or the need to maintain and grow profits in a competitive environment. Partly as a consequence, it also does not have good measures of what current sub-standard practices cost it in terms of under-utilised assets, wasted resources arising from sub-optimal decision making or policy making based on inaccurate and incomplete data. That is not to say no organisation has a view - the State Auditors of many countries might well have the data to attempt this calculation.
Continue reading
This content is not freely available. To access 'Conclusion' you need to be one of the following:
-
ACA student
-
This content is available to ACA students. If you want to start the ACA qualification there are several routes you can take
-
Business and Finance Professional
-
An internationally recognised designation and professional status from the ICAEW.
-
ICAEW member
-
Gain access to world-leading information resources, guidance and local networks. 98% of the best global brands rely on ICAEW chartered accountants.
-
Public Sector Community
-
Providing a range of valuable tools, resources and support tailored specifically to your sector.